Further action is required to make this featured image accessible
The below criteria must be satisfied:
- Add featured-image alt tag (in page properties OR on image metadata in the dam)
The image will not display until the issue above is resolved.
Faculty, Students Discuss Supreme Court at Constitution Day Event
The United States Supreme Court and the U.S. Constitution are inextricably linked, so it was appropriate that the Supreme Court was the focus when the UC College of Law hosted a Constitution Day program on Sept. 22.
Working under the title "The U.S. Supreme Court: A Faculty Conversation for Constitution Day," four UC faculty members discussed different aspects of issues concerning the court, with UC College of Law Dean Louis D. Bilionis serving as moderator.
The presenters and their topics included:
- Howard Tolley, UC Professor of Political Science and Adjunct Professor of Law, "A Review of Constitutional Law Issues for the Upcoming Term"
Tolley offered a preview of important civil liberties cases the court will hear in its upcoming term. Included were cases dealing with free speech, the free exercise of religion, privacy, states rights and criminal procedure.
He pointed in particular to one interesting twist for at least the earliest cases that will be heard in October: retiring justice Sandra Day OConnor will still be in place on the bench to hear those arguments, but will probably be replaced by a new associate justice when deliberations begin within the court.
- Christo Lassiter, UC Professor of Law, "Recent Trends in Criminal Procedure"
Lassiter, a former Judge Advocate in the Marines, expressed his belief that criminal decisions have been among the areas of the law where the current Supreme Court has made its most impactful decisions.
"Overall, I think youll have to agree that the Supreme Court under (William) Rehnquest has done quite a lot to move the ball along in terms of respecting primarily the Sixth Amendment, but also equalizing some of the protections we have in street crime and bringing those protections along for white-collar crime as well," Lassiter said.
- Ingrid Wuerth, UC Professor of Law, "The Guantanamo Prisoner Cases"
Wuerths scholarship lately has often focused on the issues of prisoners related to the War on Terror, including an article she had authored that was cited in the Hamdi case decision issued by the court last summer.
In her presentation, she tried to explain how the difficulties in ruling on the Guantanamo cases comes back to so many of the issues having truly ambiguous aspects.
"The text of the Constitution has been famously described as An invitation to struggle for the privilege of directing American foreign policy, " Wuerth said. "I think if you think carefully about the powers in question and the text available, youll completely appreciate the power of those words."
- Bert Lockwood, UC Distinguished Service Professor of Law and Director, Urban Morgan Institute for Human Rights, "The Predictability of Justices Once on the Court"
With two vacancies available for President Bush to fill, Lockwood looked at some of the unforeseen historical pitfalls that have come, even as every president has dreamed of the chance of packing the court.
But it usually doesnt work out, Lockwood said.
For instance, President Ronald Reagan took the advice of his chief of staff, John Sununu, in nominating what they thought would be a dream conservative candidate for the court in David Souter. In practice Souter has turned out to be one of the current courts more liberal members.
When President Dwight Eisenhower was asked about mistakes he made as president, he said the two biggest ones were sitting on the Supreme Court.
Further action is required to make this image accessible
One of the below criteria must be satisfied:
- Add image alt tag OR
- Mark image as decorative
The image will not display on the live site until the issue above is resolved.
And, as Lockwood added, the process itself can be unpredictable in any number of ways. When President Richard Nixon sent for confirmation to Congress a lawyer some saw as having an undistinguished record, Sen. Roman Hruska of Nebraska spoke up. "Even if he was mediocre, there are a lot of mediocre judges and people and lawyers. They are entitled to a little representation, arent they, and a little chance? We cant have all Brandeises and Cardozos and Frankfurters and stuff like that there."
Questions and a discussion period followed the end of the presentations, with more than 100 students, faculty and guests in attendance.
Tags
Related Stories
UC Law professors recognized for their scholarly achievements
March 28, 2024
Two Cincinnati Law faculty members were recognized for their scholarly body of work.
UC Law professors honored with university awards
March 28, 2024
Two UC Law professors were honored with university-wide awards.
UC Law conference to address policy, healthcare issues facing...
Event: April 12, 2024 8:30 AM
UC Law's Jones Center for Race, Gender, and Social Justice hosts conference to address policy, healthcare issues facing the LGBTQ+ community.