How Bad Does it Hurt? New Research Helps Children Suffering from Chronic Pain Conditions

A new study describes the development of pediatric pain measures for a National Institutes of Health Initiative aimed at helping doctors better evaluate and therefore better treat children who cope with chronic pain. Based on face-to-face interviews with pediatric patients, the study better captured the young patient’s perspective of living with chronic pain.

An article by researchers in the University of Cincinnati’s Department of Anthropology, UC College of Medicine Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and Emory University School of Medicine is published in the current issue of the Journal of Pain.

Lead author Jeffrey Jacobson, a UC associate professor of anthropology, says the interdisciplinary study was based on individual and focus group interviews with 32 children and with parents of children with chronic pain, including children affected by juvenile arthritis, sickle cell anemia and cerebral palsy.

The study was conducted to evaluate pain measures developed by the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) under the National Institutes of Health.  PROMIS is an initiative to create a set of freely available, broadly applicable and high-quality patient-reported outcomes – measures that can be used within and across disease conditions throughout a patient’s lifetime.

“Pain is not something that can be objectively measured, and patient-reported measures are therefore essential for research and clinical assessment,” explains Jacobson. “Our study focused on how children aged 8-to-18 experience and talk about their pain and on the kinds of language and vocabulary they like to use. “For example,” he added, “ We found that many questions or items from pain measures used with adults, describing pain as ‘gnawing or suffocating,’ made younger children uncomfortable. They appeared to relate that to a monster or someone doing something to them. They also have a more limited vocabulary than adults, particularly in relation to the more abstract language of pain quality.”

The paper describes the different categories of pain experience and language used by children when they talk about chronic pain, and the fit of these categories with those used by PROMIS:

  • Pain behavior – The child indicates he or she becomes irritable or suffers a lack of appetite (or other behavior) when in pain.
  • Pain interference – The child describes slower movement, such as walking, or lack of energy due to pain interference.
  • Pain quality – The child describes pain as sharp, cutting, dull or achy.

“The fit between PROMIS domains and those used by children was very good,” says Jacobson. “However, we also found that among some children, they would say something like, ‘I did better when the teacher gave me permission to be a little late for class, because it takes me so long to get there.’ So, they’re describing how they’re managing or coping with pain,” says Jacobson.

Other pain-coping strategies included self-distraction and exercise as well as cognitive coping strategies, such as “‘keep going, save it for another day,’” states the paper.

The study recommended 13 revisions to the PROMIS pain assessment framework for further study based on children’s feedback, including dividing pain quality into two categories – pain sensory quality (punching, twisting, electrical) and affective pain quality, including the question, ‘In the past 7 days, did your pain ever feel weird?’

The study also recommended additions to describing pain behavior including:

  • I took breaks
  • I asked for someone to help me
  • I told people I couldn’t do things with them
  • I told people I couldn’t do my usual chores
  • I tried to think of something nice/fun
  • I went to sleep
  • I had to stop what I was doing
  • I got angry at people

The authors add that their findings on pain coping warrants further study for adding to the PROMIS network.

Contributing authors on the paper are Susmita Kashikar-Zuck, Department of Pediatrics, UC College of Medicine and Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; Jennifer Farrell, Division of Rheumatology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; Kimberly Barnett, Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; Ken Goldschneider, Department of Anesthesiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; Carlton Dampier,  Emory University School of Medicine, AFLAC Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta; Natoshia Cunningham , Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center; Lori Crosby, Division of Behavioral Medicine and Clinical Psychology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center;  and Esi Morgan DeWitt, Department of Pediatrics, UC College of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center.

Funding for the interdisciplinary, multi-institutional study was supported by the  through NIHa grant awarded to Esi Morgan DeWitt.

The PROMIS network has 12 research sites around the nation including Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center.

The Journal of Pain publishes original articles related to all aspects of pain, including clinical and basic research, patient care, education and health policy.

UC’s

Department of Anthropology

in the

McMicken College of Arts and Sciences

focuses research around bioevolutionary approaches to health, ecosystem dynamics and forms of social inequality.

Related Stories

3

UC researchers develop new CPAP device

April 17, 2024

Researchers at the University of Cincinnati are developing a VortexPAP machine that takes advantage of vortex airflow technology. A preliminary clinical study with current CPAP users demonstrated that the VortexPAP can deliver the pressure levels that are used in the subjects’ CPAP therapy, but the mask is more comfortable to wear. It has a minimalistic design that is less intrusive and barely touches the patient’s face.

Debug Query for this