UC Researcher Looks at Trump's Waterboarding Boasts Do They Matter?
A study by a University of Cincinnati researcher is raising critical questions about the Trump administrations approach toward counterterrorism policies.
According to Rebecca Sanders, an assistant professor of political science, the Trump administration is breaking from the two previous administrations efforts to legally justify controversial practices such as enhanced interrogation techniques and targeted killing.
Instead, she argues, Trump has publicly endorsed blatantly illegal policies in ways that would have been unheard of in both the Bush and Obama administrations.
Sanders will present her findings in a paper titled
A Hell of a Lot Worse Than Waterboarding: Legal Legitimacy in an Illiberal Era,
at the
113th American Political Science Association Annual Meeting
on Sept. 2, in San Francisco.
During the 2016 American presidential campaign, Donald J. Trump promised to authorize a hell of a lot worse than waterboarding, kill the families of terrorists, and prevent Muslims from entering the United States, Sanders writes. Such policies would violate American and international law, raising critical questions about the capacity of legal rules to effectively limit state violence.
In her study, Sanders analyzed the legal politics of the Bush and Obama administrations, which, she says, confronted similar tensions between perceived security threats and constitutional, human rights, and humanitarian laws.
In seeking to justify contentious policies, both administrations adopted a pattern of instrumental norm compliance and revision, strategically interpreting rules to establish plausible legality for enhanced interrogation techniques, targeted killing, and other practices, she continues.
She says President Trumps capacity to enact what she terms abusive proposals is in part contingent on whether he operates within the prevailing national security culture of legal rationalization or abandons this paradigm in favor of a culture of exception that rejects and replaces legal norms.
While the Bush and Obama administrations held radically different views on torture, there is some surprising continuity in how they both quietly navigated around the law, says Sanders. They both turned to Department of Justice, Defense, CIA, and other lawyers to produce a variety of long legal memoranda that gave them legal cover for controversial policies like torture and targeted killing.
Sanders argues that the first two post-9/11 administrations operated within a national security
culture of legal rationalization
and sought to establish the
plausible legality
of contentious security practices.
President Bush, she says, relied on the so-called torture memos produced by the Office of Legal Counsel at the Department of Justice to legally justify harsh interrogation methods. The memos argued certain interrogation practices, including waterboarding, did not meet the definition of torture under the UN Convention Against Torture. This does not mean that these policies were in fact legal. They bent many international rules to their breaking point says Sanders.
We have all seen the Abu Ghraib prison photos in Iraq and we have heard stories about waterboarding and other forms of torture, says Sanders. However, the Bush administration never admitted that their enhanced interrogation program broke the law.
Instead, they insisted they did not violate the torture prohibition, she says, because they could not openly endorse torture, there was not a carte blanche for interrogators.
Not all methods were deemed acceptable only those vetted by lawyers.
Sanders says the Obama administration quickly rejected the torture memos solicited by the Bush administration. Instead, she points out, they accelerated a wide-scale program of targeted killing.
In an effort to replace Bushs harsh interrogation methods, Obamas mode of operation, she says, was to target and kill alleged terrorists, usually using drones, rather than risk the lives of American military troops by trying to capture them.
Sanders says while many human rights activists claim targeted killing is little more than illegal assassination, the Obama administration argued lethal strikes against suspected terrorists, including American citizens, in countries such as Pakistan and Yemen, were a form of perfectly lawful killing in war.
There are a lot of moving parts in terms of calculating effectiveness, and my research isnt so much about whether these tactics are effective, but how policy makers have tried to justify them in light of the constraining norms that are supposed to place limitations on these types of controversial activities, adds Sanders.
While many of the aforementioned legal opinions, especially the torture memos, were widely rejected by international legal experts, these legal arguments helped immunize American officials from prosecution for torture and extrajudicial killing and broaden public acceptance of their actions. They helped them get away with it says Sanders. At the same time, the need for legal cover imposed at least some limits on policy.
In contrast, Sanders argues, President Trump appears to be leading the United States toward a national security
culture of exception.
She says he has overtly advocated human rights abuses, does not rely on euphemistic or legalistic language, and in fact, rarely talks about the law at all.
The question now is are we seeing a radical change in the legal culture, at least being attempted, says Sanders. The Bush and Obama administrations, despite their differences, operated in a culture of legal rationalization.
With the Trump administration you see them embracing, or at least trying to push a culture of exception where the President has the power to do what he wants, when he wants to.
For more information:
Sanders APSA presentation summarizes themes discussed in greater depth in her upcoming book,
Plausible Legality: Legal Culture and Political Imperative in the Global War on Terror,
currently under contract with Oxford University Press and will come out in 2018.
Interested in a political science career?
Apply to UCs
or
program and
become a leader.
Related Stories
First-ever Gen-Z Insights event hosted by UC NEXT Innovation...
April 19, 2024
In academia, the intersection of innovation, collaboration and the fresh perspectives of the University of Cincinnati NEXT Innovation Scholars (NIS) holds immense promise. As a multi-disciplinary student group of innovators, the program balances university, corporate and non-profit partners. NIS students are driven by curiosity, passion, future creation and pursuing innovation, fostering a community of forward-thinkers poised to tackle tomorrow's challenges today. Recently, these young visionaries hosted an inaugural Gen-Z Insights showcase event at the UC 1819 Innovation Hub. The packed room of attendees included 1819 corporate partners such as Kao and Main Street Ventures and distinguished faculty and staff members. All were eager to hear and learn more from NIS scholars and the industry projects they worked on throughout the year.
UC offers experiential learning abroad in Central America
April 19, 2024
In the tropical paradise of Costa Rica, fourth year journalism and international affairs student Stephanie Rivera embarked on an unforgettable journey of self-discovery and cultural immersion. Leaving behind the familiar sights and sounds of Cincinnati, Rivera set out to study abroad for a transformative semester in this Central American country, rich with vibrant biodiversity and cultural heritage. The College of Arts & Sciences (A&S) at UC places great emphasis on encouraging study abroad and experiential learning opportunities for its students. Recognizing the transformative power of global experiences, the college supports a variety of study-abroad programs that enable students to enhance their academic pursuits while gaining valuable cultural and personal experiences.
Media coverage and word of mouth extends DAAP art exhibit to...
April 19, 2024
Due to popular draw, the art exhibit "Rediscovering Catharina van Hemessen’s Scourging of Christ: Women Artists, Patrons, and Rulers in Renaissance Europe" has been extended at the DAAP Library through April 30.