Reuters: Walmart was hit with a $125 million verdict, but the law is on its side

Sandra Sperino, a professor at the University of Cincinnati College of Law, told Reuters that one of the “weird” things about the statute is that it specifies that the jury shouldn’t be told about the damages cap. Sperino wrote a book in 2017 called "Unequal: How America’s Courts Undermine Discrimination Law." She said she has plans to incorporate the Walmart case into her courses at UC because it seems like a good tool to teach the issue of statutory damages caps.

“The jury deliberates without any knowledge of the cap. Then, when it actually comes into play, it’s the judge that reduces the award according to the cap,” she said.

There’s certainly a message being sent, though of a different sort than Burrows, or the jurors, likely meant.

Labor Secretary Marty Walsh commented that $1 million is both a relatively large fine by OSHA standards, and “not enough” of a disincentive for businesses that abuse employees and cut corners on regulatory compliance.

“Some of the employment discrimination statutes have even more limited damages than the Americans with Disabilities Act and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act,” Sperino said. “Those statutes don’t necessarily stand out as outliers.”

Read the entire story here. 

Lead photo/John Gress/Reuters