Bloomberg Law: School DEI training appeal poses complex worker speech questions

If an employee believes that the job training they received requires them to support anti-racism theories, does that violate their free-speech rights? Perhaps. A federal appeals court in St. Louis heard arguments last week by two public school workers who believe so.  At the heart of the issue is whether an adverse action is needed for government employees to have standing to sue under the First Amendment or whether the infringement alone is sufficient harm are among the main questions. A ruling by the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit could provide clarity for public employers and employees elsewhere.

Professor Brad Mank

Professor Brad Mank

“There needs to be an adverse act for there to be standing to sue”, Professor Bradford C. Mank of the University of Cincinnati College of Law told Bloomberg Law. Mank was quoted in the article “School DEI Training Appeal Poses Complex Worker Speech Questions”.  

If an employee attends training, disagrees with the substance, and the trainer pushes back, “I don’t know if that alone is enough,” he said. Discomfort with training is too broad a test, said Mank, who isn’t involved in this case.

Thomas Berry of the Cato Institute and James V.F. Dickey, an attorney with the Upper Midwest Law Center and the Center for the American Experiment, which is representing the plaintiffs, had a different perspective.

“A First Amendment violation on its own confers standing,” Dickey said in the article. In the employment context, there often is an adverse action or other negative consequence, but that isn’t needed in free-speech cases, he said.

Sometimes the negative consequences of not complying or of speaking out are clear from the context, Berry said. All that’s needed is a fear of punishment and the plaintiffs here feared repercussions “if they continued to be honest about what they believe,” he said.

Read the story in Bloomberg Law.  

Lead photo: istockphoto.com; Mank: UC Photography

Related Stories

1

Can you grow new brain cells?

March 6, 2026

As National Geographic recently reported, a pair of new studies have provided fresh evidence in the long-running scientific debate on if adults can grow new brain cells. The result could be game-changing for treating diseases such as Alzheimer’s and dementia.

2

Using GLP-1s for weight loss, maintenance after bariatric surgery

March 5, 2026

Bariatric surgery has become a cornerstone treatment for severe obesity and its related comorbidities, offering superior long-term efficacy compared with lifestyle and pharmacologic interventions alone. Yet persistent clinical gaps remain in a subset of patients, including insufficient weight loss and postoperative weight regain.

3

UC marketing class featured in Super Bowl Ad Meter School Spotlight

March 4, 2026

University of Cincinnati’s Lindner College of Business was one of just 16 institutions representing USA Today’s Ad Meter School Spotlight program, where students got to evaluate the ads and publish their findings alongside industry professionals. The students' top-rated commercials largely aligned with Ad Meter’s official rankings, with Budweiser's "American Icons" earning the highest score. The participants included over 300 students across two marketing classes taught by assistant professor-educator Summer Shelton. She came to the University from a marketing research firm and brings experience ranking Super Bowl commercials as an industry professional herself.