Why is gerrymandering bad?
UC professor explains stakes of politically driven redistricting
WOSU's show Untangled turned to a University of Cincinnati political science professor to explain the consequences of gerrymandering in state redistricting maps.
UC College of Arts and Sciences Professor David Niven explained how gerrymandering can have unexpected consequences, particularly in small towns that are divided into multiple congressional districts.
Political scientists say in many gerrymandered districts, the primary decides who will win the lopsided general election. As a result, candidates often race to stake out extreme positions to appeal to the hard-right or hard-left bases. And those positions often conflict with the views of many of their constituents.
And in states that have been politically gerrymandered, voters lose much of their ability to hold elected officials accountable.
As a result, state legislatures that benefit from gerrymandering with supermajorities sometimes can be out of step with voters. That happened in 2023 when 57% of Ohio voters enshrined abortion rights in the state constitution through a ballot question in opposition to the views of the Republican-dominated Legislature and governor.
Niven said gerrymandering that ignores the geography of municipal or county boundaries for the sake of political advantage can create confusion among voters when towns get split into multiple districts.
“They look out their front door and see a yard sign for a congressional candidate and they can't vote for that candidate because they're not in that district,” Niven told WOSU.
And Niven said members of Congress are likely to pay less attention to towns where they represent just a fraction of voters.
Ohio voters will decide a ballot question in November backed by Citizens Not Politicians that would replace the Ohio Redistricting Commission composed of elected officials with an independent 15-member panel of Republicans, Democrats and political independents. Retired judges would appoint the commission members.
Featured image at top: UC political science Professor David Niven says gerrymandering can have unexpected consequences long after elections. Photo/Andrew Higley/UC Marketing + Brand
Related Stories
Colorado silica dust trial could change the way industry does business
May 17, 2026
Betsy Malloy, Andrew Katsanis Professor of Law, at the University of Cincinnati, spoke with Bloomberg Law about how a Colorado trial could change the way the stone fabrication industry does business.
Driven by curiosity, guided by care
May 14, 2026
Max Wilson, a University of Cincinnati College of Allied Health Sciences health sciences major on the pre-physician assistant track, found his path expanding beyond the classroom and into hands-on research focused on human performance and patient care.
Will a gas tax help lower prices at the pump?
May 14, 2026
WCPO recently reported on Kentucky and Indiana’s steps to combat surging gas prices, cutting and suspending state gas taxes, respectively. UC economist Michael Jones explained the impact on Cincinnati.