How well does 'collar' work to protect athletes?
UC biomedical engineering researchers study ways to prevent sports concussions
The Washington Post talked to a University of Cincinnati biomedical engineering professor about a sports neck collar designed to protect the brain.
UC College of Engineering and Applied Science Professor Tom Talavage was a consultant for Q30 Innovations, maker of the Q-collar that many athletes wear to prevent brain injuries from tackles, collisions or blows to the head.
Biomedical engineering students put helmets to the test at UC's Bioscience Center. Photo/Andrew Higley/UC
Reviewers with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration examined whether the collar's springy metal can prevent concussions by applying pressure to the jugular vein to restrict the flow of blood in the skull. The company added language to its manual stating that it does not prevent concussions or long-term cognitive problems, the Post said.
More than 280,000 children are treated for sports-related concussions in U.S. emergency rooms each year. But federal health officials say children sustain as many as 3.8 million concussions from sports each year.
Talavage said he is interested in exploring injuries that can occur from smaller, repetitive blows along with the catastrophic head blows that lead to visits to the emergency room.
Talavage and his research partners are looking for ways to improve sports equipment, including helmets, to prevent traumatic brain injuries.
Talavage, who heads UC's Department of Biomedical Engineering, told the Post that he believes the Q-collar does provide some preventive benefits. But he added that the company might be overstating the conclusions of researchers.
“We can’t make the argument that the collar prevents concussion, but it might take longer or be less likely if you use it,” he said.
Talavage studies the brains of high school football players who are subjected to repeated subconcussive blows from blocks, tackles and hitting the ground. Talavage said athletes who wore the Q-collar showed meaningfully less evidence of inflammation from taking these smaller but repetitive blows.
“I think the collar is doing something, and it’s probably doing something that is good,” Talavage told the Post. ”But I would not say it is proven to protect the brain from injury.”
Read the Washington Post story.
Featured image at top: UC Professor Tom Talavage talks to Local 12 reporters at UC's Bioscience Center. Photo/Michael Miller
UC Professor Tom Talavage is studying ways to prevent concussions in sports. Photo/Andrew Higley/UC
Related Stories
Recent advances may speed time to endometriosis diagnosis
March 16, 2026
The average time to clinical diagnosis of endometriosis is nine years. Definitive diagnosis of the disease is difficult, and until recently, has relied on laparoscopic surgery. Now, as Medscape recently reported, novel clinical recommendations, advanced diagnostic tools and research into inflammation and immune responses, are bringing promise that women with endometriosis will find relief sooner and without surgery, according to experts, including Katie Burns, PhD, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine associate professor.
Position-specific helmets may not improve protection
March 16, 2026
Local 12 highlighted a new study by biomedical engineering researchers that looked at how well new football helmets protected players from impacts that can cause concussions.
UC biologist talks about 'pearmageddon'
March 16, 2026
WLWT talks to UC biologist and Department Head Theresa Culley about invasive, nonnative Callery pear trees that are spreading across Ohio forests after they were introduced by landscapers more than 50 years ago.