UC professor finds gender bias negatively affects professors’ evaluations
Science, Phys.org report on study led by Oriana Aragon
Professors in the gender minority of university academic departments tend to receive lower scores in their performance evaluations because of gender bias, a study led by a University of Cincinnati professor found.
Oriana Aragon, a social psychologist and assistant professor of marketing in UC’s Carl H. Lindner College of Business, led a study with colleagues from the University of Colorado Boulder and Clemson University that explored the effects of gender bias in student evaluations of professors’ performance, publications including Science, Phys.org and Inside Higher Ed reported.
Oriana Aragon, assistant professor of marketing at the University of Cincinnati Carl H. Lindner College of Business
For the study, which was published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Aragon and her fellow researchers looked at more than 100,000 evaluations from 4,700 courses at Clemson.
They discovered that in departments with more men as professors, women had lower average student evaluation ratings when teaching higher level courses. For departments with more women as professors, men had lower average student evaluation ratings when teaching higher level courses.
In departments with approximately an equal number of men and women as professors, the bias disappeared.
“The fact that women and men alike were penalized illustrates how stereotypes are broadly harmful,” Asia Eaton, a social psychologist at Florida International University, said to Science about the study’s findings. “The studies in this paper do an excellent job of studying gender bias in context.”
Aragon and her colleagues also performed an experiment in which they created a website for a theoretical academic department and enlisted student volunteers. Students were presented descriptions of mock courses with the picture and biography of a male or female instructor.
The students in the experiment evaluated the professors as if they had taken the mock courses. The same gender biases found in the student evaluations from actual courses were shown in the theoretical courses.
The effects of the biases could be very harmful to professors, as student evaluations often are used to help make decisions about which faculty members get promotions and tenure.
“Denying tenure for a small difference in teaching eval scores would be really a tragedy,” Aragón said to Science.
Read more:
Featured image at top courtesy of Unsplash.
Next Lives Here
The University of Cincinnati is classified as a Research 1 institution by the Carnegie Commission and is ranked in the National Science Foundation's Top-35 public research universities. UC's medical, graduate and undergraduate students and faculty investigate problems and innovate solutions with real-world impact. Next Lives Here.
Related Stories
Cincinnati Edition: What does work look like after COVID?
November 4, 2022
After the COVID-19 pandemic upended traditional work structures, employers now are contemplating how they’ll manage their employees whether they’re working in-person or remote.
WCPO: UC football’s success could increase enrollment
October 20, 2021
The undefeated University of Cincinnati football team recently reached its highest-ever ranking (No. 2) in program history, and a professor in the Carl H. Lindner College of Business thinks the team’s growing influence on social media could attract future students.
Why does bad news make some people smile?
September 6, 2022
For some people, sad news draws an uncomfortable smile to their face. Oriana Aragon, a social psychologist and assistant professor of marketing in the University of Cincinnati’s Carl H. Lindner College of Business, joined the “Every Little Thing” podcast to explain this phenomenon of feelings not matching expressions, which is called a dimorphous expression of emotion.