LGBTQ couples in South Korea enjoy a rare legal win for health benefits
The Wall Street Journal reports on LGBTQ acceptance and speaks with UC Law's Ryan Thoreson
LGBTQ individuals continue to face challenges in gaining public acceptance of same-sex couples in South Korea. But that community enjoyed a win earlier this year thanks to a mix up in joint family coverage with the nation’s public health insurer.
The case involving fairness for Kim Young-min and So Sung-uk ended up before South Korea’s Supreme Court when their health benefits were rescinded. A hard fought legal battle eventually produced a landmark victory earlier this year. The high court’s chief justice called the rescinding of health benefits an act of discrimination that “violates human dignity and value.”
The Wall Street Journal reported the story, which also appeared recently on MSN, and spoke with Ryan Thoreson, an assistant professor in the University of Cincinnati College of Law.
Ryan Thoreson is an assistant professor at UC Law.
South Korean activists and lawyers say the Supreme Court’s recent ruling affects joint health coverage, but is likely applicable to a wider range of government services and entitlements.
Thoreson told The Wall Street Journal that once courts provide same-sex couples the protections afforded to married households, the argument against marriage equality for LGBTQ individuals becomes increasingly difficult.
Furthermore, the more visibility LGBTQ couples have in society, like Kim and So in South Korea, the more accepting the public becomes of such causes, added Thoreson, who is also a specialist on LGBTQ right for Human Rights Watch
“The public storytelling around these cases is essential for non-LGBTQ people to understand what’s at stake,” Thoreson told The Wall Street Journal.
Two-fifths of South Koreans support same-sex marriage, according to the Pew Research Center. That is lower than the Asia-wide median of roughly 50%, Pew said.
Thoreson, who received his JD at Yale University, is a scholar of contemporary social movements around gender and sexuality, constitutional law, comparative and international law and human rights law.
Read the full story from The Wall Street Journal story online.
Learn more about the scholarship of UC Law’s Ryan Thoreson online.
Related Stories
Marcus Sapp says he’s finally free after wrongful murder charges tossed
September 8, 2024
Marcus Sapp, an Ohio Innocence Project exoneree, spoke with The Cincinnati Enquirer about his journey to freedom following a wrongful murder conviction. OIP at UC Law took his case and uncovered exculpatory evidence that should have been presented during his initial trial.
WCPO-TV/Channel 9: Ohio Innocence Project at UC takes on possible wrongful conviction case
May 10, 2021
UC's Ohio Innocence Project helped earn freedom for a Cleveland man after more than 14 years in prison. Michael Sutton was one of two men convicted in 2006 as a teenager for the shooting of two people and the attemped shooting of a police officer. He and Kenny Phillips were freed on bond on May 3, 2021.
TIME: What Bill Cosby’s release really says about getting a conviction overturned in America
July 8, 2021
Mark Godsey, a UC Law professor, was one of the experts cited by TIME Magazine for a story on the release of comedian Bill Cosby.