Exploring the current use and future of alternatives to traditional informed consent in acute stroke trials

MSN highlights editorial authored by UC experts

MSN highlighted an editorial written by the University of Cincinnati’s Yasmin Aziz, MD, and Joseph Broderick, MD, published Nov. 7 in the journal Neurology analyzing the current use and potential future of alternatives to traditional informed consent in acute stroke trials.   

Patient informed consent is a crucial part of ethical clinical trial design and implementation, but time is of the essence for stroke trials. Approximately 2 million neurons die each minute they are deprived of oxygen, and patients are also sometimes incapacitated and therefore unable to consent to a trial, highlighting the need for emergency consent in certain cases.

There is currently no worldwide standard for emergency consent for stroke trials, with various approaches taken by different countries.

“This editorial is intended to educate the greater neurology community about these consent procedures and their current relevance to stroke research in particular,” said Aziz, assistant professor in the Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine in UC’s College of Medicine and a UC Health physician.

Broderick is principal investigator of the FASTEST trial, the first acute stroke trial in the United States to use exception from informed consent (EFIC) protocols. 

“...Community consultation and public disclosure are unique to EFIC,” the authors wrote. “Both requirements can be quite expensive and time-consuming, delaying study start-up. Efforts to make EFIC more efficient and less costly in the US are ongoing.” 

The coauthors noted as the field continues to explore the most effective and efficient alternatives to prospective informed consent, the “principles of patient autonomy and beneficence remain imperative.” Aziz said improving consent procedures is an opportunity to “keep moving the chains forward” for stroke research.

“The United States in particular has a very dark, very recent, unethical history with certain populations and the performance of clinical research,” she said. “We need to find the best way to honor patient autonomy while moving research forward to ultimately get better treatments to the bedside.”

Read the MSN article.

Neuro Rehab Times also covered the editorial. Read the Neuro Rehab Times article.

Featured photo at top of brain scans. Photo courtesy of Joseph Broderick.

 

Related Stories

1

University of Cincinnati’s IDD Education Center to Host Ninth Annual Red & Black Blast

December 18, 2025

The University of Cincinnati’s IDD Education Center will host its ninth annual Red & Black Blast on February 25, 2026, at Tangeman University Center. The signature event celebrates and supports the Center’s four programs—CEES, TAP, IMPACT Innovation, and RAAC—which create pathways in education, employment, and community life for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD).

2

PhD student uses engineering to understand cardiovascular system

December 17, 2025

Drawn to the University of Cincinnati for the strong reputation in cardiovascular research and the connections with the UC Medical Center, Shrayesh Manegaonkar is pursuing a PhD in mechanical engineering at the College of Engineering and Applied Science. Recently, he was named Graduate Student Engineer of the Month for his work on biofluid mechanics, aiming to develop better diagnostic tools for cardiovascular diseases.

3

Ohio looks to fast-track wastewater discharge permits

December 16, 2025

Bradford Mank, James B. Helmer Jr. Professor of Law at the University of Cincinnati, spoke with WVXU for a story about a proposal by the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency to streamline the way wastewater discharge permits are issued to data centers.