This provision could ban AI regulation for 10 years
Director of UC’s Applied AI Lab speaks on advanced tech safeguards
Congress' proposed “big beautiful bill” has a provision that would ban states from enforcing regulation on artificial intelligence models and systems for 10 years.
Cincinnati Edition recently spoke with Jeffrey Shaffer, director of UC’s Applied AI Lab, for insight on what the provision's legal implications could be at the crossroads of innovation and safety.
Shaffer told Cincinnati Edition that regulation on generative AI is critical. “There definitely needs to be more guardrails and more security,” he said. “The question is: who does that? Do we do it at a more global level, a federal level or a more local level?”
Shaffer pointed out the lack of clarity in the proposed AI provision. “The problem here is that, with the moratorium, the 10 years would eliminate states from doing anything. And then there’s no discussion at the moment of what the federal rules would be,” he said. Using the example of financial services, he explained that broad federal regulation can aid states in choosing to be more restrictive or not on any given regulatory guideline. And in turn, it can be easier for the federal government to streamline its regulations by using states’ legislation as a working model.
Shaffer also emphasized the importance of regulation in the business of AI chatbots. “It’s easy to take them off their rails. With a few prompt injections, you can get it to do nefarious things,” he said.
“I don’t think we can trust the current guardrails in the current state of AI, especially around deepfakes, deep videos, voice, all of that. With a couple minutes of anybody on YouTube, I can imitate their image or the sound of their voice. I can write fake and malicious content very quickly,” Shaffer said. He also added that the danger is not just external, but also puts companies’ proprietary and internal data at risk.
On top of that, it’s hard to tell what the state of AI will be in a decade. Shaffer said even AI experts have conflicting opinions on topics such as whether AI tools will continue to require such large amounts of energy to operate in the future. “The 10 year time period here is so long in the field where we are advancing things week by week,” Shaffer said.
Shaffer pushed for understanding and transparency when it comes to both utilizing AI tools and regulating them. “We need to shore up a lot of these definitions — even starting with the definition of what AI is — so it’s clear what we’re putting up guardrails around.”
Listen to the full interview on Cincinnati Edition.
Featured image at top: AI-themed overlay on person using a laptop. Photo/iStock
Related Stories
UC aerospace engineer leads global computational fluid dynamics taskforce
October 21, 2026
The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics' CFD 2030 Integration Committee has announced the formation of the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Vision 2045 Team, a multi-institution working group tasked with defining where the field of computational fluid dynamics should be by 2045 to align with the changing and evolving needs of the aerospace industry. The University of Cincinnati's Prashant Khare, Bradley Jones professor and head of the Department of Aerospace Engineering, is leading this specialized group.
UC Blue Ash Career Champions make career development part of the everyday experience
October 21, 2026
The University of Cincinnati Blue Ash College is bringing career development into students' everyday experiences through its Career Champions program.
Still the top ‘cat
October 20, 2026
The University of Cincinnati Bearcat mascot was voted Cincinnati’s favorite mascot in a Cincinnati Enquirer reader poll, earning 45.1% of the vote and topping other local favorites.