What is 'sunscreen doping,' and should we be concerned about it?
UC expert featured in Allure article
The University of Cincinnati's Kelly Dobos was featured in an Allure article discussing "sunscreen doping." The phrase describes brands reportedly not using chemical filters so they can market sunscreens as 100% mineral, only to include ingredients that are not technically chemical filters but function similarly to them.
While suncreens are labeled either "chemical" or "mineral" in stores, Dobos previously noted this describes how the products work rather than whether they are derived from "natural ingredients." Mineral sunscreens create a barrier on the skin to reflect UV rays, while chemical sunscreens are absorbed into the skin and create chemical reactions that lead to repelling UV rays.
Sunscreen doping implies a negative connotation that brands are "cheating," much like athletes using performance-enhancing drugs, by burying the names of certain ingredients on drug facts labels.
Dobos explained the ingredients in question are not sunscreen filters themselves and typically don't provide effective UV protection on their own. But when used combined with an FDA-approved chemical or mineral filter, they can greatly increase UV protection.
The bottom line, Dobos said, is there is not currently enough data to conclude whether these "sunscreen boosters" are inherently safe or unsafe because they have not been formally petitioned as a sunscreen active ingredient to the Food and Drug Administration.
“Sunscreen boosters haven’t been subjected to the gauntlet of safety testing that [FDA-approved UV filters] are currently subject to,” said Dobos, a cosmetic chemist and adjunct instructor in UC's Cosmetic Science Program in the James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy. “While these boosting ingredients may be safe as currently used, we just don’t have the same amount of data.”
Featured photo a top of a person applying sunscreen. Photo/simonkr/iStock.
Related Stories
Recent advances may speed time to endometriosis diagnosis
March 16, 2026
The average time to clinical diagnosis of endometriosis is nine years. Definitive diagnosis of the disease is difficult, and until recently, has relied on laparoscopic surgery. Now, as Medscape recently reported, novel clinical recommendations, advanced diagnostic tools and research into inflammation and immune responses, are bringing promise that women with endometriosis will find relief sooner and without surgery, according to experts, including Katie Burns, PhD, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine associate professor.
Position-specific helmets may not improve protection
March 16, 2026
Local 12 highlighted a new study by biomedical engineering researchers that looked at how well new football helmets protected players from impacts that can cause concussions.
UC biologist talks about 'pearmageddon'
March 16, 2026
WLWT talks to UC biologist and Department Head Theresa Culley about invasive, nonnative Callery pear trees that are spreading across Ohio forests after they were introduced by landscapers more than 50 years ago.