New York Times cites UC research in story about second-and thirdhand smoke
Health columnist Jane E. Brody quotes University of Cincinnati professors as she makes the case that parents should keep their children out of places smoking is permitted
Research penned by University of Cincinnati faculty members inspired The New York Times personal health columnist Jane E. Brody to write about the ongoing threat posed by second- and thirdhand smoke to the health of children exposed to them.
In "The Risks to Children From Adults Who Smoke," Brody makes the case that children should be kept away from places where smoking is permitted, even if no one is smoking at a given time.
"Wise parents should keep their children out of any environment where smoking is allowed, even if no one is smoking there at the time," Brody writes. "The reason? Growing concern about the potential harms caused by exposure to the nicotine and other tobacco toxicants in thirdhand smoke that linger in the environment long after the smoke is gone."
Brody's argument relies on published research by UC faculty members about the effects of chronic tobacco exposure on children in both the short and long term. First she cites the work of Dr. E. Melinda Mahabee-Gittens and colleagues at UC, published in March 2017 in Tobacco Control. Mahabee-Gittens and company discovered that the residue from secondhand smoke accumulates on smokers and the surfaces in the vicinity of where they smoke, and that those toxicants can easily get on children's hands and into their bodies.
She also quotes human services professor Ashley L. Merianos, whose research published recently in Pediatrics finds that as little as one hour of exposure to secondhand smoke per week can have a significant impact on the health of adolescents.
Brody is among the most prominent health writers in the world, having served in her role as personal health columnist for The New York Times since 1976. Her widely read column appears in The Times' Science Times section and in numerous newspapers across the country.
A research powerhouse
The University of Cincinnati is classified as a Research I institution by the Carnegie Commission, and is ranked in the National Science Foundation's top 35 public research universities. UC's graduate students and faculty investigate problems and innovate solutions with real-world impact. Learn more about advanced degrees at UC.
Related Stories
Julie Leftwich appointed Director of International Peace and...
April 18, 2024
Julie Leftwich appointed Director of International Peace and Security Initiatives at the University of Cincinnati College of Law.
UC Law professor’s article named a Dukeminier Award recipient
April 18, 2024
Professor Ryan Thoreson's law review article named a Dukeminier Award recipient.
WLWT: Tips to fight off bad allergy symptoms
April 18, 2024
The University of Cincinnati's Ahmad Sedaghat spoke with WLWT about how Cincinnati's geography tends to make allergy symptoms worse and tips to fight off those symptoms.
UC’s Ground Floor Makerspace births combat robots
April 17, 2024
In the heart of UC's 1819 Innovation Hub lies the Ground Floor Makerspace, an advanced and active hub of ingenuity where students, faculty and the community converge to bring their ideas to life. This includes being the birthplace of robots much like miniature race cars, combating fender to fender in an enclosed boxing ring. Combat robots like UC's Maximizer will again be fighting for first place in the National Havoc Robot League (NHRL) competition, slated for April 20.
Medscape: Skin adverse events rare after immunotherapy to treat...
April 17, 2024
Medscape highlighted University of Cincinnati research published in JAMA Dermatology that found skin adverse events were rare following immunotherapy treatments for certain skin cancers.
UC researchers develop new CPAP device
April 17, 2024
Researchers at the University of Cincinnati are developing a VortexPAP machine that takes advantage of vortex airflow technology. A preliminary clinical study with current CPAP users demonstrated that the VortexPAP can deliver the pressure levels that are used in the subjects’ CPAP therapy, but the mask is more comfortable to wear. It has a minimalistic design that is less intrusive and barely touches the patient’s face.